Nicky Barnes swaggered. In the 1970s, when he strode along the
streets of Harlem, everyone noticed.
“There goes Nicky Barnes,” they would say. They noticed his custom-made suits and shoes,
his full-length leather coats, his flashy ties, his look of bold command. Everything about him said elegance, power,
success. And when he drove on the
streets of Harlem, often with a beautiful woman not his wife beside him, they
noticed his Mercedes-Benz, his Thunderbird, his Lincoln Continental, his
Cadillac, and knew that he was fabulously rich, to the tune of a hundred
million dollars. Not everyone admired
the drug lord of Harlem who had flooded their neighborhoods with heroin, but
many did, especially the street kids, for in a world where everything was against
them, this son of Harlem had made it big, very big, and it gave them hope. The authorities noticed him too, but if a law
enforcement surveillance team followed him, he took delight in leading them on
a high-speed chase, to see if he could shake them off.
In 1977 the New York Times also noticed Barnes and decided to do an article on him in the Sunday Magazine section chronicling his uncanny ability to wiggle
out of charges and arrests. The Times asked Barnes to pose for a cover
photo; though unwilling, when informed that they were going to use a mug shot
from a previous arrest, the dapper drug lord agreed. When the June 5, 1977, issue appeared, there
on the cover of the Magazine section was Barnes in a blue denim suit with a
red, white, and blue tie, looking composed and elegant, with the label “Mister
Untouchable”; it was the peak of his career.
I remember that issue; it was the first time I'd ever heard of Nicky Barnes. I didn’t admire him, but I marveled at his
charmed existence. But President
Jimmy Carter also saw the article, and Barnes’s look of smug invulnerability infuriated
him. He told his attorney general to get
him.
Every day at noon a gleaming limousine
pulled into the driveway of a modest split-level house in the Howard Beach
section of Queens, and out of the house came a barrel-chested, broad-shouldered
man in a muted double-breasted suit, creamy white shirt, and hand-painted
floral silk tie, his silvery hair swept back, his step springy. He stepped into the waiting limousine, a
Mercedes-Benz or Lincoln, and off he went, his bodyguard at the wheel.
Arriving at the Bergin Hunt and Fish Club
in the Ozone Park district of Queens, he settled down in a barber’s chair
installed there especially for him and had his hair cut, washed, and blow-dried
in what had become a daily ritual. He
then conferred with his lieutenants, for whom the club was a regular
hangout. In the late afternoon he was
driven to the Ravenite Social Club, his main headquarters, on Mulberry Street
in Little Italy, Manhattan, where the top members of his family – meaning his
organization – reported to him regularly.
If in the course of his daily rounds he
spied FBI agents tailing him, he might rub one index finger against another
while mockingly saying, “Naughty, naughty,” though he was also known to offer
them coffee. And if, when he entered a
restaurant, he saw people gawking at him, he relished it, for unlike most Mafia
capos, who shunned attention, the Dapper Don loved it and considered these
gawkers his fans. “When people go to the
circus,” he once told a subordinate, “they don’t want to see the clowns. They want to see lions and tigers, and that’s
what we are.” Waiters showered him with
attention, but he always sat with his back to the wall, commanding a wide view
of his surroundings, just in case.
From his associates he demanded and got
respect. Brawny bodyguards accompanied
him everywhere, and even his brothers held doors open for him, helped him put
on or take off his coat, and held umbrellas over his well coiffed head. In public he was always elegant, always
poised and amiable, though in private he was known for a fiery temper and a
foul tongue, and a readiness to betray allies.
On the street, moving out of the range of any concealed microphones, he
might order a killing, perhaps a loyalist whom he deemed a traitor or who had failed
to show him respect. Needless to say, he was
feared.
Such was John Gotti, the Dapper Don, in
the 1980s. He claimed to be a hard-working
family man making $100,000 a year as a plumbing supply salesman and from a job
with a garment accessories firm, but everyone knew he was a top Mafia boss, astute
and ruthless, grossing $500 million a year from illegal activities in the New
York area and Florida. And his Howard Beach neighbors
admired him, flocking to the annual summer street party that he sponsored at
his social club in Queens. When news
came of his acquittal on racketeering charges, they decorated trees near his
home with yellow ribbons, a symbol of concern for hostages. For many Italian Americans he was a symbol of
success, a hero. And his acquittal in
three much publicized trials in the 1980s gave him another nickname, the Teflon
Don. Arrested yet again in 1990, in the back
of a police car he announced, “I bet ya three to one I beat this.” Having immersed himself in a world of
obsequious subordinates, he thought he was invincible.
Nicky Barnes and John Gotti, Mister
Untouchable and the Teflon Don, are prime examples of outlaws who loved
attention and flaunted their contempt for the law. Known criminals, for years they seemed to get
away with it and were admired, if not by everyone, by many in the ethnic group
they came from. Their swagger won them
praise.
But not immunity. Following President Carter’s order, Nicky
Barnes was arrested for drug-related crimes and sentenced to life in prison
without parole on January 19, 1978. In
prison, learning that his associates weren’t looking after his interests,
Barnes helped the authorities indict 44 other drug traffickers, 16 of whom were
convicted. Because of his cooperation,
he was resentenced to 35 years in prison and was released in August 1998,
following which he entered the federal Witness Protection Program and began a
new life with a different name.
John Gotti was convicted in 1992 on
multiple charges that included murder, conspiracy, loansharking, and illegal
gambling and was sentenced to life in prison without parole. “The Teflon is gone,” announced an FBI
official. Diagnosed with throat cancer,
he deteriorated rapidly and died in prison in 2002 at age 61.
What exactly is an outlaw? In this country the word suggests the desperadoes
of the Old West, but the word goes back much further and has a wider
application. Webster’s Second defines
“outlaw” as follows:
1.
A person excluded
from the benefit of the law, or deprived of its protection.
2. Hence: A lawless person, or a fugitive from
the law.
The first definition applies to premodern
times, when an outlaw was someone excluded from the protection of the law;
anyone could persecute or kill him. But
later, in medieval England, those suspected of crimes had to be judged in a
court of law before punishment could be administered. And already outlaws were being admired, as
seen in the stories of the perhaps mythical Robin Hood. But being declared an outlaw meant that you
were banished from civilized society, and anyone who gave you food, shelter, or
other support risked likewise being declared a criminal. This changed with time, as population density
made it harder for fugitives to avoid capture, and modern concepts of law and
order took hold. Today the second
definition prevails.
Billy the Kid, the quintessential outlaw. |
In this country’s history those who have
been labeled outlaws include pirates and
buccaneers (Jean Lafitte), Western desperadoes (Jesse James, Billy the Kid),
gangsters (Al Capone, John Dillinger, Bonnie and Clyde), and motorcycle clubs
like Hell’s Angels. Most of these
outlaws have inspired both fear and admiration, though the admiration usually
implies a certain distance from the outlaw, so we don’t feel menaced, and a
certain romanticizing, a blurring of unpleasant facts, which the media and Hollywood
have often been happy to do. The fact
remains, many law-abiding citizens can’t help but admire those who break the
law and seem to get away with it. Yet at
the same time we resent the outlaws’ seeming immunity and feel great satisfaction
when they are apprehended or killed.
Who in the history of New York City can be
viewed as an outlaw? Madame Restell, the
notorious but successful nineteenth-century abortionist who has visited these
pages before, paraded herself and her ill-gotten gains for years, provoking
condemnation but eluding prosecution.
Like Nicky Barnes and John Gotti, she shunned the shadows, displayed
herself in daily carriage promenades, and violated the decorum and
exclusiveness of fashionable Fifth Avenue by building a handsome brownstone
mansion only a block from the rising walls of Saint Patrick’s Cathedral. Few in those days dared voice admiration of
Madame, but given the less rigid mores of today, feminists have discovered and
extolled her as a woman in advance of her time.
But she too paid a price: arrested by the Puritan crusader Anthony
Comstock, on the eve of her trial she cut her throat from ear to ear.
Were the robber barons outlaws? Commodore Vanderbilt, the first to whom the
label “robber baron” was applied, reputedly once said, “Law? What do I care about the law? I got the power, hain’t I?” Which would certainly suggest that he merited
the label “outlaw” as well. Trouble is,
he probably never said that. Another
robber baron, Jay Gould, skirted illegality throughout his career, but may
never quite have broken the law.
Christened “the Mephistopheles of Wall Street,” he was supremely unloved,
but his daring market coups provoked amazement and wonder, if rarely
admiration. He got away with a lot, but
the laws were looser then and there was little regulation.
Who in our own time might be labeled
outlaws? Politicians immediately come to
mind, as for example Jimmy “Beau James” Walker, the mayor of New York from 1926
to 1932, at the peak of the Roaring Twenties and beyond, who has appeared on
these pages more than once. Fond of
leading celebrity parades down Fifth Avenue, and fond as well of speakeasies
and showgirls, he was fun-loving and dapper, and was on the take from
businessmen eager to get city contracts.
When an investigation began uncovering evidence of corruption in his
administration, he decamped for Europe with his showgirl girlfriend and
returned only when the risk of prosecution had faded. But when he did return, ferry whistles
greeted him in the harbor, and a multitude of well-wishers awaited him at the
dock. He was elegant and charming, so
many New Yorkers forgave him his rumored peccadillos. An outlaw?
Maybe only a rascal, but he did get away with a lot.
He wasn’t the only one. For years, the crucial decisions about
legislation in Albany were decided in secret by a committee of three: the
governor, whether Democrat or Republican; Joseph Bruno, Majority Leader of the
Republican-dominated State Senate; and Sheldon Silver, Speaker of the Democratic-dominated
State Assembly. All too often their
private enclave produced legislation that legislators had to vote on
immediately, without having time to read its contents and know what they were
enacting. Little wonder that Albany was
considered one of the most corrupt state governments – if not the most corrupt – in the nation. If Congress was – and is – a swamp, Albany is
a cesspool.
Like many, I deplored this system,
suspected rank corruption, and wondered how long they could get away with
it. For years they did, and cries for
reform went unanswered. Governors came
and went, but Bruno and Silver persisted, like hardy weeds. Bruno, an upstate Republican, and Silver, a
New York City Democrat, balanced each other out and exerted vast
influence. Outlaws of a kind, I
suspected, but there were only rumors and suspicions, nothing that would hold
up in court.
UpstateNYer |
In 2008 Joseph Bruno announced that he
would not seek reelection and shortly afterward resigned from the Senate in the
wake of a federal corruption investigation.
In January 2009 he was indicted on eight counts of corruption, including
mail and wire fraud. It didn’t surprise
me, and I felt a delicious satisfaction at seeing one of the mighty brought
down. In 2010 he was convicted and
sentenced to two years in prison. But
never underestimate the skills of good lawyers.
In 2011 Bruno’s attorneys got his conviction overturned on a
technicality. A legal imbroglio followed
with resulting delays, and in 2014 Bruno was retried and acquitted on both charges. White-haired and buoyant, Bruno, age 85, left
the courthouse smiling, then with friends and admirers adjourned to a nearby
oyster house, where he told journalists that his case involved “persecution,
not prosecution.” Still popular in his upstate
home district, he is honored there with his name on a minor-league baseball
stadium, as well as a commemorative bust at the Albany airport. An outlaw, I suspect, who did in the end get
away with it.
Sheldon Silver, Speaker of the Assembly. For looks, Bruno wins. For power, it was a toss-up. |
And what about Silver, a bespectacled and
jowly man with graying hair who looks like your benign and smiling uncle? When Tweedledee was indicted, I hoped that Tweedledum would follow.
Reelected Speaker of the Assembly eleven times, despite complaints by
upstate Republican members that he wielded too much power, Silver was guarded and
shrewd, not open and jovial, seemed unassailable. He controlled where Assembly members parked,
the size and location of their offices, how much money they could spend on
their staffs, and who got the lucrative Assembly leadership posts. An Orthodox Jew born and raised on
Manhattan’s Lower East Side, he had a solid base of support there, comparable
to Bruno’s base upstate. But like Bruno
before him, on January 22, 2015, he was arrested on federal corruption charges
resulting from his receiving large payments over the years from a law firm
advocating reductions of New York City real estate taxes. Under intense political pressure and with
dwindling support, on January 30 he resigned as Speaker, while remaining an
Assembly member and vowing to fight the charges against him. Will Tweedledum, like Tweedledee before him,
be acquitted? Given the stench that
emanates from Albany, I hope not. But
he’s innocent until proven guilty. Time
will tell.
So much for politicians. How about CEOs of banks: can they be
classified as outlaws? If so, they’re
sure getting away with it, for I’m not aware of any of them going to prison; at
most, the banks get fined some outsized sum that the shareholders have to pay, while
the CEOs get their usual fat bonuses.
But have the banks really committed dark deeds? Here are some of their alleged or admitted
crimes:
· Laundering money for terrorists. Bank of America is said to have funneled
large amounts of money to BCCI, an international bank with offices in Karachi
and London, which in turn funneled it to Bin Laden and other terrorists.
· Laundering money for drug cartels. In 2013 London-based HSBC, Europe’s largest
bank, settled with the U.S. for $1.9 billion to resolve charges that it enabled
Latin American drug cartels to launder billions of dollars. And in 2015 Swiss authorities raided two HSBC
offices in Geneva as part of a new criminal inquiry into allegations of money
laundering. And Wachovia, now owned by Wells Fargo, settled with the U.S.
Department of Justice for $160 million in 2010 for moving billions from Mexican
drug cartels into currency exchange houses.
· Manipulating the price of precious metals.
In 2015 the U.S. Department of Justice launched an investigation into the
manipulation of the price of gold and silver by at least ten of the world’s
biggest banks.
· Deceiving regulators by hiding the extent of their
losses. J.P. Morgan Chase has been
accused of this by the Senate’s Permanent Committee on Investigations.
·
Selling complex
investments without disclosing the risks.
Wells Fargo and its subsidiary Wachovia have been fined for these
offenses many times, and J.P. Morgan Chase settled with the SEC for $153
million in 2011 for similar charges. In
2013 Bank of America settled for $14 billion with Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, and
other agencies, and in 2010 Goldman Sachs settled with the SEC for $550
million.
And these are only some of
the charges. Are the CEOs gloating in
private as they get their bonuses, or are they sweating in the face of more
possible charges? Either way, I see them
as modern-style outlaws, seemingly immune to the rigors of justice.
Dare we aim higher? Diplomat and statesman Henry Kissinger, the
confidant of presidents, admitted to saying, “The illegal we do
immediately. The unconstitutional takes
a little longer.” He was joking of
course, wasn’t he? To pursue this
further would take us into deep waters indeed, and the highest levels of
government. Have any of our post-World
War II presidents broken the law? Have
any not? How high can outlawry go? To probe such matters would require one or
several posts and take us far afield from New York, the focus of this
blog. But there’s lots to ponder.
Finally, how about whistleblowers? They often violate the letter of the law so as to make public the misdeeds of government agencies, but in spite of U.S. legislation meant to protect them from retaliation, they often suffer dire consequences. I’ll mention only Edward Snowden, now a fugitive in Russia, who in 2013 leaked thousands of classified documents from the National Security Agency to the mainstream media. Those documents revealed massive global surveillance programs by the NSA and cooperating European governments and provoked heated debates over mass surveillance, government secrecy, and the conflicting claims of national security and the right to privacy. Indicted by the U.S. Justice Department for violating the Espionage Act and theft of government property, he has been hailed as a hero and denounced as a traitor. Polls indicate more support for him abroad than in the U.S. Personally I view him as an outlaw hero, one who broke the law with justification, and I rejoice in his immunity at present in Russia. Time magazine named Snowden the runner-up for Person of the Year in 2013, losing out to Pope Francis, and he has received numerous awards. Yes, a modern outlaw, no swaggerer but highly controversial, and one whose story is still unfolding.
Coming soon: Why do the names of banks mention chemicals,
drovers, shoes, and old J.P.? A glance
at the history of New York banks, and how they once were creative in a way that
benefited the whole community.
©
2015 Clifford Browder
No comments:
Post a Comment